Selective Search
Selective Search is a high-end matchmaking service that singles join to get set up on dates with high-caliber people. With its reputation for catering to affluent and successful individuals, Selective Search promises to take the hassle out of dating by setting up curated matches.
But is Selective Search too good to be true? How expensive is Selective Search and is it worth the cost? Is it a scam?
We pored through Selective Search reviews, and here’s what we found out about Selective Search’s pricing and pros and cons.
How much does Selective Search cost?
As of 2024, a one-year membership generally starts around $25,000 for singles over the age of 35, and $15,000 for those under 35. These fees are designed to cater to serious clients who are willing to invest substantially in their search for a partner.
For women, there is an option to join the Selective Search database without paying the membership fee. However, this comes with no guarantees of being contacted for dates, and such individuals are often not prioritized in the matchmaking process.
PROS — What people liked about Selective Search
•Done-for-you matching — Selective Search members talk to a matchmaker about what they’re looking for and then get set up on dates. This is a welcome respite from manually searching for matches on apps and websites.
•Exceptional dating pool — The Selective Search database is known for its high-quality candidates, often including professionals such as doctors, lawyers, executives, and entrepreneurs. There is also a presence of former models among the female members, which appeals to those looking for physically attractive partners as well as intellectual equals.
•Unlimited “presentations” — Being a Selective Search member guarantees a certain amount of “introductions,” but viewing a bio and photo of a potential date doesn’t count toward this quota.
CONS — What people disliked about Selective Search
•You schedule and plan dates — Once a match is made, the responsibility of scheduling and planning the date falls on the member. For some, this can be a downside, especially considering the premium fees they have paid for the service.
•Men tend to be older and traditional; women tend to be valued for looks — Some women, all of them non-paying, described feeling physically objectified by matchmakers and set up with old-fashioned (and sometimes unpleasant) men much older than themselves. Meanwhile, some male clients have expressed dissatisfaction with being paired with women they perceive as overly focused on appearance or materialism, deemed “plastic.”
•Concerns about differing priorities — As a member of Selective Search, you’ll be set up with people who aren’t fellow paying clients. Some members say this means their dates don’t share the same seriousness. Additionally, there’s concern about young females in the database wanting “sugar daddies” rather than love and connection. Selective Search says they vet candidates to try to account for issues.
•No guarantees — Often, with a high cost comes high expectations. Unfortunately, Selective Search can’t guarantee that pairings will have romantic chemistry or even that every match will meet 100% of your criteria. Many reviews touch on this, with reviewers saying the people presented to them didn’t meet their stated specifications.
Overall takeaway: 🤷
Selective Search membership could be a viable option for someone who has a lot to spend and wants to forego the hassle of dating on their own.
However, given the significant cost and the lack of guarantees, it may not be the best fit for everyone—particularly those who are budget-conscious or prefer a more hands-on approach to dating.
Just want better luck with dating apps? Here’s the secret…
Test your dating pics on Photofeeler to make sure they are doing you justice.
Studies show that people are terrible at picking flattering photos of themselves. And nowhere is that more evident than on dating sites/apps.
Photofeeler tells you how you’re coming across in pics. That way, you only use your best ones. (And you might be shocked at which ones those are.)
